Jordan Holland successfully argued that a clause in a will had the effect of providing an annuity for his clients’ maintenance.
Rose J handed down judgment in Tish v Olley, finding that Jordan’s arguments were clear and straightforward and rejected the arguments advanced on behalf of the testator’s second wife.
The judgment was given in a preliminary issue ordered in a claim brought by Jordan’s clients pursuant to the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
A link to the judgment can be found here.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful. You can adjust your preferences below.
Essential Cookies are enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings. These cookies do not collect any personal or sensitive information or IP addresses. Furthermore, the information they store is not sent to any 3rd parties.
This website uses third party cookies such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel to collect anonymous information, for example the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages. Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.
Please enable Essential Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
More information about our Cookie Policy