Shân and the team represented the trustee and corporate director of the underlying investment company in arguing successfully that neither was liable in light of a clear and definite anti-Bartlett clause in a Jersey law trust. The Court unanimously held that such a clause is effective and there is no “high level supervisory duty” which trumps it. As the only case on anti-Bartlett clauses at the appellate level, the case is of great international significance. For further information please click here
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful. You can adjust your preferences below.
Essential Cookies are enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings. These cookies do not collect any personal or sensitive information or IP addresses. Furthermore, the information they store is not sent to any 3rd parties.
This website uses third party cookies such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel to collect anonymous information, for example the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages. Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.
Please enable Essential Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
More information about our Cookie Policy